Friday, November 15, 2019

who really has 5g

one way to understand 5g is where is it cheapest because it also has the most masive use not just by mobile people but internet of things
what does itu say about 5g
forbes nov2019 authortwitter landscape 2 1
south china post
you tell us

nov2019 - wireless network generation standards, the baselines are defined by an industry organization called the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project), which, as its name suggests, was first put together to help define worldwide standards for 3G cellular networks 20 years ago. The 3GPP creates what are called Release Documents every few years that define some of the core capabilities of next generation wireless networks. The current release document is called Release 15, and it came out in June 2019 with many important new advances, including the full definition of the 5G NR (New Radio) standard, which forms the foundation of 5G service. 5G NR is the protocol used to send and receive wireless signals from devices like smartphones to the cellular network infrastructure (i.e., cell towers).
Makers of 5G are China's Huawei and from Nordica Regiob Ericckson and Nokia
Companies that purchase and install the network infrastructure equipment are the very well-known telco  carriers—the AT&T’s, Verizon’s, T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s of the world. Most carriers (sometimes also called operators or service providers) are very regional and only operate in a few countries. Many of them outside the US are owned and/or run by their country’s governments, including the big three in China: China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom. The carriers, of course, are also the companies that create the wireless plans and other services we use and subscribe to. One important thing to note is that carriers all think differently from one another and often prioritize certain technologies or capabilities (and subsequently price them) in very different ways. For example, the Chinese telecom companies have been deploying 5G networks faster than anywhere else in the world, because they see it as a key long-term economic and technological advantage for the entire country.


Operators will shift toward small-cell solutions to satisfy urban capacity

In rural and suburban areas, as well as along roadways, operators can handle increased traffic simply by densifying existing networks with macro sites. In many highly populated urban areas, by contrast, they’ll need to rely on small-cell solutions for two reasons: a higher concentration of traffic, as measured by traffic load per square kilometer, and the use of higher spectrum bands (greater than 3 gigahertz).

In one recent analysis of a European city, we found that that sites with traffic density above 0.5 petabyte per square kilometer per year had a cell radius of less than 200 meters, necessitating small-cell solutions. Many other major cities or urban neighborhoods, including Kowloon, Manhattan, and Helsinki, have similar density, and others will be in that situation by about 2020 (Exhibit 3). Many major cities will be at 1 or 2 petabytes per square kilometer by 2025.

We're proud to say that communication service providers all around the world have chosen to deploy 5G using our leading network technology. So far we have ...
4 days ago - According to China Daily, the contracts with Ericsson and Nokia demonstrate the China's “open attitude to all international players” when ...
Sep 8, 2019 - Unlike other trade shows such as Mobile World Congress, though, IFA's 5G focus wasn't on super high-end, expensive 5G phones (well, aside ...
Sep 3, 2019 - Huawei has scored more than 50 commercial 5G contracts globally as the Chinese technology giant continues to strike deals with carriers ...

Aug 20, 2019 - China Unicom recently said in a press conference its 5G data packages will cost a minimum of 190 yuan ($28.3), Beijing Daily reported on ...

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Hello next 3 weeks see3 big events for transforming education - if anyone is going and able to share what happens would love to know either through thiis facebook or email - 1 wise qatar votes for its 8th global laureate from nov 19 w1st laureate was bangladesh womens fazle abed brac - w7th was patrick founder of ghana's new university- then nov 22 dhaka ban ki-moon commencement speech launches brac uni 2.0 as the most cooperative girls sdg uni- and on dec 2 hong kongs co-founder of tencent celebrates the yidan laureate hong kong has always inspired me as the east's freest entrepreneurial city so will be there nov 28- dec 2 welcome a drink with anyone with happy ideas on futures of youth

Saturday, November 9, 2019

If you don't get Bloomberg special series on this and would like me to relay it for private use please say
all the best chris macrae Asia-Broadway sdgs +1 240 316 8157 -what future do you invite millennials to exponentially sustain 

IF the U.S. is serious about meeting the challenge from China, it should really be focused on is science and technology.
A new report out this week by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, chaired by former Google chairman (and New Economy Forum delegate) Eric Schmidt , should be a wake-up call to anybody who believes that a trade deal will level the playing field between the U.S. and China. The competition has only just begun.
And in the domain of artificial intelligence, the digital wellspring of America’s future prosperity and national security, China is winning.
Consider these findings from the report:
  • From 1991 to 2015, China’s spending on AI increased 30 times while U.S. outlays grew only marginally. A decade from now, China will outspend the U.S. in absolute terms.
  • America’s leadership in AI research is shrinking. Next year, Chinese scientists will overtake Americans in the most-cited 10% of AI academic papers.
  • The global reach and sophistication of China’s AI giants, including Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent, may soon overtake their American counterparts, giving China even more data to dominate the technology.
To be clear, America still dominates the field; U.S. universities train the top AI minds. But the U.S. is throwing away the key sources of its advantage. “We are beginning to see troublesome signs that America’s ability to attract and keep the top global talent may be weakening,” the report says.
Restricting visas for Chinese scientists is an extraordinary folly, as is a desire among China hawks in Washington for a broad technological decoupling, which will rob U.S. tech companies of the revenues they need to fund research and stay ahead.
The core issue here is the collapse of trust between the U.S. and China. But as the report notes, that shouldn’t prevent them from collaborating on AI applications that are manifestly good for humanity, such as disaster relief or finding a cure for cancer. As it happens, the New Economy Forum in Beijing later this month will launch an initiative along these lines. 
Sponsor Content by China Vanke Co., Ltd
Vanke will take part in the 2019 New Economy Forum, as the forum’s first Chinese partner. Yu Liang, the company’s Chairman of the Board, will attend the forum and share his thoughts on the topic of urbanization. Established in 1984, Vanke has been deeply involved in China’s urbanization, and has become a leading urban and rural developer and service provider today. Learn more about us here

“Co-opetition” or confrontation?

An op-ed by the prominent Chinese politician and diplomat Fu Ying, also a New Economy Forum delegate, proposes three scenarios for U.S.-China relations. First: “co-opetition,” a mix of cooperation and benign competition. Second: full confrontation. Third: drift.
Notably absent from Fu’s analysis is any recognition whatsoever that China may be partly to blame for the plunge in U.S.-China ties. According to this line of thinking, China pursues peace, America wages wars; China seeks global partnerships, America chases hegemony.
A similar tone imbued a key Communist party meeting that wrapped up last week. One of its main messages was that, while China is committed to opening its markets wider to foreign companies, President Xi Jinping intends to double down on state control. His plans for a “new national system for making breakthroughs in core technologies under socialist market economy conditions” sound a lot like the old Made in China 2025 blueprint for Chinese technological supremacy.
Trump’s proposed mini-trade deal won’t affect the trajectory of Chinese industrial policy one bit. Between “co-opetition,” confrontation and drift, we should be hoping for the first outcome, but preparing for the second.

Monday, November 4, 2019

GAMES of worldrecordjobs and asks how do you value future of health services?
 -study WRJ Fazle Abed with staff James Grant School of public health, Paul Farmer  1 2, Leana Wen  Bloomberg Health student networks- you tell us - how can help Greta and her generation male planet earth sustainable for the next 10 billion children how can restore celebration of arts to every community and every fashion garment worker as well as the world's superstars- guides include Japanese-global team producing and searchers at sice 2004 launch Indira Gandhi Center

which are the top 20 peoples economics co-blogs you can help us map

is self-learning possible

.Chris Macrae commented on this
Chris Macrae commented on this
A huge thanks to everyone who supported the Floating in Darkness campaign. The book contains an important and unifying message the world needs to hear. Please join our FB Group and be a part of the community. hashtagthanks
Activate link to view larger image.
Chris Macrae commented on this
BRAC’s Play Labs, created by Sir Fazle Hasan ABED KCMG and his team, allow the most vulnerable children to access quality and affordable Early Childhood Education. The Play Lab project employs a unique model that promotes early years’ learning for socio-economically challenged children as young as three to five years of age, using play activities as a learning tool. Watch the video below to find out what the FIVE COMPONENTS of the project are. hashtagYidanPrize hashtagYidanPrizeLaureates hashtagYidanPrizeSummit hashtagbrac hashtagPlaylab with BRAC
Current time 0:06
Duration 1:17
Hello its been long time since i contributed to this group if you have time please look at I believe that jobs education is bigger than economics especially for those who want to be the end poverty generation and make sure technology celebrates human endeavors - i dont understand why is it we have to go back 60 years to 1960 since a national leader assigned a network of 10000 young brains one goal -ie kennedy moon race- that showed human and tech could do almost anything imaginable- so i am trying to edit a pack of 55 playing cards -which leaders could be like kennedy if we could help access their knowhow- i expect many of my first choices are wrong- for example who is the one WRJ that I have so far nof featured that most matters to you? If you read this but prefer to post one thing you most want help actioning in next 12 months by all means post that instead of voting for a WRJ whats app +1 240 316 8157 washington dc region usa- family's nationality diaspora scot- age as young as i feel but not millennial!
Chris Macrae commented on this
If you are a subscriber of Amazon Prime, now's the time to check out my books for free!
Activate link to view larger image.